A community meeting was held back in February 2008 in relation to another of the Shire's plannig strategies - the LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING STRATEGY. About 20 people attended the workshop - and identified the following issues as being of value to them:
• Natural, undisturbed areas and, subsequently areas with high biodiversity (coastal, bushland,
waterways, wetlands, marine environments)
• Current sense of community, peace and quiet, rural character, markets
• Lack of urban sprawl
• Nature-based recreation/tourism education
• Biodiversity (flora and fauna, remnant vegetation and protection of biodiversity)
• Preservation of coastline, coastal fringe and foreshore (protect existing areas, keep development
low and restricted to defined nodes)
• Geographe Bay in its natural state (views, recreation, tourism, marine diversity, waterways and
wetlands)
• Relatively low population density/base
• Waterways and wetlands
• Sustainable farming – need to preserve
• Public Open Space (parks, reserves)
• Potable Water Supply – water board management – no additives
Clean air and drinking water
• Openness of landscape and low human footprint
• Marine and terrestrial biodiversity
• Landscape and coastal diversity
Given that this information was obtained over 12 months ago, and that it originated from a small sample of the Shire's population, I wonder whether these things are still important.
Are there any additional things that the community likes about the Shire that should be taken into account as this settlement strategy is prepared?